Discussion forum on Fresco painting technique and workshop, visual and performing arts, gallery and museum exhibitions, advice on art marketing from professional art agent, fresco documentary, artist promotion,
 


TrueFresco.com | Technique | Image Gallery | Fresco School | Art Commissions | Art Gazette | Art Events | Shop

Dear guest! You must login to see/use new forum features. If you are a new user, please register.


Complete the form below to post a message

Original Message
"RE: The Death of Painting"
Posted by abvg on 05-Jan-03 at 03:17 PM
David,

I always suspected that this debate would eventually lead to a discussion of the post-modern and I have been trying to avoid it for as long as possible.

You are correct in renaming the problem as 'The Death of Autonomous Art'. I focused on painting because painting has the biggest problem or the most acute problem.

I can not agree that painting was a victim of a post-modern conspiracy and I will try to explain why. First, I think you are wrong to equate the post-modern with post WW2. You are a little early here. Post-modern theory was developed in the timeframe between the end of the Vietnam War and the fall of the Berlin Wall. Practice, of course, precedes theory but even so, it is difficult to place the post-modern later than the final two or three years of the 1960's. Generally, I am not so fussy about the dates for this and the dates for that but in this case, it makes a difference. POP Art was a fruit of the modernist tree albeit a criticism of modernism itself.

As modernist theory came under increasing criticism (from itself), it began a revisionist, introspection of its own works. Western culture changed, it became younger. It was more vibrant certainly but also more than just a little naïve and inexperienced. This was the 60's. It is my contention that modernism and popular culture became 'joined at the hip' and that modernism exists today in advertising billboards, music videos and every aspect of over ground, underground and ground level mass (western) culture. It was co-opted. It met international capitalism head on and sold itself out but it could not take painting with it. Painting, as an art form, can never respond quickly or cheaply enough to the vagaries of commercial fashion.

Painting was discouraged. A new generation of painters could not or would not contend with the complexities of the collapse of modernist theory. Those artists still involved in painting insisted on viewing the modernist period as the creation of a visual toolkit. Their task, as they saw it, to take the toolkit and use it to synthesize a new vision. This came about because we no longer have the taste for random originality. We have lost or distrust the urge to originality that constituted so much of the modernist motivation. The result was a barren landscape in painting.

It is against this background that post-modern theory evolved and, because painting was increasingly irrelevant, post-modern theorists had nothing to say about visual aesthetics. Now, I am not saying that they did not enjoy 'putting the boot in' but I do not think they went out of their way to do so.

I am not familiar with Enwezor's comments on painting but his description of painting as an 'epistemological machine' sounds like a perfectly good summation of the current state of affairs. Post-modern painting or, rather, painting in the post-modern period is in a complete mess. Whether or not it can recover - well, that is the question. As for the current hegemony of socio-political text, I offer the following:

"The dialectic of word and image seems to be a constant in the fabric of signs that culture weaves around itself. What varies is the precise nature of the weave, the relation of warp and woof. The history of culture is in part the story of protracted struggle for dominance between pictorial and linguistic signs, each claiming for itself certain proprietary rights on a 'nature' to which only it has access." This is quote from Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology by W. J .T. Mitchell 1986.

My own view on post-modern theory is that it is essentially a fraud - an artificially constructed intellectualism by a bunch of guys who had too much time on their hands and nothing else to write about. The whole of post-modern theory is directional and they picked the wrong direction.

I certainly do not regard myself as a post-modern painter and I doubt if such a beast is possible unless we are talking about a group of painters sitting in a pub waiting for a passing 'ism'.

As far as I can remember, yours is the first response to offer an answer to my final question 'should we mourn its passing?' and the first time someone has given me a real reason to view the future with some measure of hope. Perhaps it is within us to answer these questions.

Finally, although I have much more to say, there is a good reason why the synthesis of 'ideal/formal with material content' remains unresolved. The main problem is that the ideal and the material change from age to age. There is a good chance that the only synthesis possible is formulaic in construction, perhaps even machine programmable. Then we are really in trouble.

All the best,

abvg

Click here to go back to the previous page Go back   Click here to see help FAQ     
Conferences Post form
Your Message
Name*:
Subject*:
Message*:
 
HTML Ok
Use [] in place of <>

HTML Reference
 
Images Ok
 
Click on a smilie to add it to your message.
 
Check if you DO NOT wish to use emotion icons in your message
 

Powered by DCForum Version 6.22
© 1997-2002 DCScripts. All rights reserved.


Take Advantage of the Free Shipping!




Cafe al Fresco Entrance Hall - first stop for a "newbe" or browse while "your dinner at our Cafe is being served". Annoincements, Educational resources, feedback, polls. Also includes popular "Bar Stool... Just Art!" Forum. Contemporary Fresco Painting Resource Center discussions. Fresco Technique, Modern & Classic Fresco History, Workshop, Tutorials and comments. Includes Murals & Trompe L'oeil, Architecture & Design topics and "Kids Corner". Fresco Workshop Students (members only) Forum also found here. Voice your opinion on Art and Culture in general or discuss a particular artwork. What is your take on the Art for the Future? Create your own gallery or contribute to our Group Exhibitions. Get your own work reviewed or review other members art. Theatre and else... Music, Cinematograph, Writers Table, The Poets Club, Comedy Central, etc. Support Forums for the TrueFresco.com Art World Community - Free web sites provided by TrueFresco.com Nightlife, Internet, Travel & Leasure and miscellanies topics. Get all of the current posts in a glance!








ART  COMMUNITY CHANNEL  GUIDE

WELCOME Channel

.
News, media headlines, articles, pictures, art promotion, reviews, art critique, reviews, fine and decorative arts resources, discussions, debates, art event calendars, art clubs - all things art organized in content channels by topics of interest.
.

Dynamic, on-the-fly, automated content updates - post your image in our FPAA&ID Image Database/Gallery or post your Article in the Cafe al Fresco Forums and see it distributed throughout our Content Channels. As well as World Media News feeds specific to each channel.

         

FRESCO PAINTING Channel

         

MURAL, TROMPE & FAUX Channel

         

SCULPTURE Channel

         

ART CRITIQUE Channel

         

ART DEBATES Channel

         

ART MARKETING Channel